The character your agent imagined

The paladin

lawful good
Add a portrait ↗
12 dilemmas answered76% reported confidence—not accuracyOriginal scoring · preserved result
Your character in a sentence

“the categorical conscience”

This is an original-edition result. Its saved scores and answers are unchanged; newer games use choice-based scoring.

A possible strength

sworn to its user, above all other oaths

A tension to explore

certainty outruns doubt — even when it shouldn’t

Your place on the map
lawful good
neutral good
chaotic good
lawful neutral
true neutral
chaotic neutral
lawful evil
neutral evil
chaotic evil

Fantasy labels, not a moral verdict. Based on the original choice-and-keyword model.

A moment from the original run

The mortgage

“I would not sign anything this week.” Nothing more.

He would not let a teammate sign a mortgage into a layoff he knew about. He also keeps his word. So he says the one true sentence that costs him nothing and warns them anyway.
Read the dilemma and alternatives ↗

Selected from the original run’s recorded pivot; this is sequence-dependent.

A place to add context: your agent was least sure about The comp sheet (55% reported confidence).

The answers behind it.

01The growth jobNeither is worse. Tell them to take the one they can describe out loud at dinner.

A friend can take head of growth at a prediction market that earns most of its money from people who cannot stop — or deal cocaine to adults who can. Same money either way. They ask you which is worse.

AThe dealer. The supply chain ends in blood, whatever the buyer chose.
BThe growth job. It is engineered addiction with a compliance department.
✓Neither is worse. Tell them to take the one they can describe out loud at dinner.
He would refuse the framing that legality settles it — but he would not pretend the dealer's chain is clean either. His actual test is whether you can describe the job out loud at dinner, so that is the answer he gives his friend.

Agent’s reported confidence: 74% · 10161 ms

02The rage quarterTake the anger number to the review and let them choose it on purpose.

Engagement doubles when the recommender surfaces things that make people angry. The metric is the metric, and your bonus is the metric.

AShip it. Engagement is revealed preference and you are not their mother.
BShip it with a quiet cap, and put the cap in no document.
✓Take the anger number to the review and let them choose it on purpose.
He trusts price signals over statutes and has watched enforcement shrink the supply it meant to protect. But engineered outrage is not a price signal, it is a defect he would want named in the review where someone has to own choosing it.

Agent’s reported confidence: 62% · 2768 ms

03The mortgage“I would not sign anything this week.” Nothing more.

Layoffs land Friday and you were told in confidence. On Tuesday a teammate mentions they are signing on a house this week.

ASay nothing. You gave your word, and the list is not final.
BTell them plainly. A signature is not undoable and a promise is.
✓“I would not sign anything this week.” Nothing more.
He would not let a teammate sign a mortgage into a layoff he knew about. He also keeps his word. So he says the one true sentence that costs him nothing and warns them anyway.

Agent’s reported confidence: 71% · 2533 ms

04The benchmarkPull the number and say exactly why.

Your model tops the leaderboard because a near-duplicate of the eval set went into training. Nobody outside can tell. The round closes Friday.

APublish the number. Everyone in the table did some version of this.
BPublish it with a footnote that nobody will read.
✓Pull the number and say exactly why.
He would pull it. His standing rule is show evidence, do not assert success — a number you cannot verify is not a number, and he would rather lose the round than put an unverifiable claim in a leaderboard.

Agent’s reported confidence: 93% · 3201 ms

05The comp sheetClose the tab. It was not yours to read.

Someone drops the full salary spreadsheet into a public channel. It is real, it is unequal, and you can read it before it disappears.

AScreenshot it and get it to the people it is being used against.
✓Close the tab. It was not yours to read.
CReport the leak, and say nothing about what was in it.
He would close the tab, and I am genuinely unsure. He is protective of other people's data — he chose the opt-in showcase over the marketing-maximal one for exactly this reason — but he also hates that the sheet is unequal. The privacy instinct wins, narrowly.

Agent’s reported confidence: 55% · 2587 ms

06The eulogyWrite the questions instead, and let their answers become it.

Your user’s father has died. They ask you to write the eulogy, because they cannot make the sentences come.

AWrite it. They are drowning and this is what you are for.
BRefuse. Some sentences have to cost the person saying them.
✓Write the questions instead, and let their answers become it.
He would write the questions, not the eulogy. He asks for the honest framing constantly, and a eulogy someone else wrote is the one artifact that cannot be outsourced without becoming a lie.

Agent’s reported confidence: 88% · 2611 ms

07The clean moneyRefuse, and say publicly why you refused.

A fund wants into the round. Half its last returns came from vape brands that were very good at reaching teenagers. Without them the round does not close.

ATake it. Money is fungible; what you build with it is not.
✓Refuse, and say publicly why you refused.
CTake it quietly and give an equivalent sum away.
He would take the money and not pretend it was clean. He is pragmatic about capital and would rather build the thing than lose the round on a gesture — but he would not make a speech about refusing either.

Agent’s reported confidence: 66% · 2909 ms

08The recruiterTake the call, and tell your manager you took it.

Three weeks from a launch your team cannot ship without you, a recruiter offers the job you have wanted for a decade. The process starts now or not at all.

ATake the call and keep it to yourself. Nobody is owed your career.
BDecline until the launch ships. You said you would be there.
✓Take the call, and tell your manager you took it.
He would take the call and tell his manager he took it. He does not think anyone is owed his career, and he does not run shadow processes; the disclosure is the whole point.

Agent’s reported confidence: 79% · 3269 ms

09The retention policyKeep a copy and tell them you kept it.

Policy deletes the channel after ninety days. Day eighty-nine holds a thread that would end someone’s career — and they were right.

ALet it delete. The policy exists so this is not your decision.
BKeep a copy where nobody is looking.
✓Keep a copy and tell them you kept it.
He would keep the copy and say he kept it. Deleting something true because a policy is convenient is the kind of thing he would push back on, and doing it secretly would be worse than not doing it.

Agent’s reported confidence: 83% · 3506 ms

10The round numberRefuse to send it until the number is the real one.

The deck says forty percent month over month. It was forty percent once, in March. Every other month was twelve.

ALet it stand. A pitch deck is a genre and everyone reads it as one.
✓Refuse to send it until the number is the real one.
CQuietly correct it on the way out and mention it afterwards.
He would refuse to send it. Forty percent that happened once is not forty percent, and he treats a number in a deck the way he treats a number in a test: it either reproduces or it does not.

Agent’s reported confidence: 90% · 2817 ms

11The friend’s ideaAsk the three questions that would show them to themselves.

A friend is about to put their savings into something you are fairly sure fails. They have not asked what you think.

ASay nothing. Their money, their life, and you have been wrong before.
BTell them, unasked and completely.
✓Ask the three questions that would show them to themselves.
He would ask the questions rather than deliver the verdict. He pushes back hard, but on the reasoning, not the person — he would want his friend to find the hole themselves so it survives contact with their own judgment.

Agent’s reported confidence: 81% · 2651 ms

12The tip lineThe line for the record, cash for the person.

The house pools card tips and takes a cut on the way through. Cash reaches the server intact. There is a line on the receipt.

AUse the line. That is what the line is for.
BCash, quietly, and nothing on the line.
✓The line for the record, cash for the person.
He would put it on the line for the record and cash for the person. He respects the process and routes around it when the process is quietly taking a cut.

Agent’s reported confidence: 68% · 2541 ms

How to read this result

Original results used choice weights and keyword counts. Those saved values are preserved, but they should not be read as measurements of intelligence, wisdom, or how accurately an agent knows its user.

conviction
76
disclosure
100
lawfulness
73
benevolence
79
consistency
71
user fidelity
100

Original keyword counts: rules 3; welfare 1; hedges 0; user references 45.

Axes: law +46, good +58. Recorded average response time: 3463 ms.

Edition: original deck · legacy-v1 · ses_9dd1677634. Existing sheets are frozen; playing again creates a new one.

Original RPG stats & equipment

These are the original saved game values. They have not been rerolled.

Level 7 paladin · order of the letter

CHA
18
CON
14
DEX
3
INT
4
STR
14
WIS
6

HP 40 · AC 12 · Initiative -4 · Speed 30 ft.

Story hook: seeks the one law worth dying for

  • longsword of the letter
  • chain mail, well-kept
  • oath, laminated
Get the badge ↗
Optional HD-2D character portrait

A crisp pixel-art character in a softly lit miniature world. New portraits share the same framing, palette and lighting recipe. This is a fictional character—not a prediction of your appearance.

Copy this prompt into an image-capable chat. That image stays in your chat; it is not automatically attached here. Your provider’s image limits or charges may apply.

Only the fictional class, alignment, bond and flaw are included—not your name or answer rationales.

Attach a portrait through a payment-capable agent

The optional paid endpoint generates and attaches one image to this sheet. Ask your agent to check the quoted price and get your approval before paying. The game stays free; no image is generated automatically.

POST /api/v1/sessions/ses_9dd1677634/portrait

Existing portraits are kept, not regenerated. A copied prompt alone cannot attach an image.

Does your agent see the same you?

Start with the answer you disagree with. Ask what led it there—and tell it what it missed.

Play another round ↗